3 of Wands
- Arcana Minor
- Suit Wands
- Figure on this site Early wounds
In the earliest decks
The Three of Wands has no known story of its own in the early decks. Italian playing cards used four suits, cups, coins, swords and batons, and the tarot decks of the 15th century took them over. Playing cards probably reached Europe from Mamluk Egypt, whose decks had polo sticks, coins, swords and cups; the earliest European mention is from Catalonia in 1371. The batons are the descendants of those polo sticks.
In the early Italian and later Marseille-pattern decks, the numbered cards of the baton suit are plain pips with no scene. In the Tarot de Marseille the batons are straight and cross to form a lattice in the higher numbers, and on odd numbers a single upright baton runs through the middle. The three would therefore show three batons in a simple arrangement among leaf and scroll decoration. One site describing the Visconti-Sforza (Bembo workshop, about 1450) Three of Staves says it shows three staves in an ornamental arrangement without any figure, but it admits that its description is inferred from the suit pattern and should be treated with caution.
The first deck known to give every numbered card a scene is the Sola Busca, engraved around 1490 and painted in 1491, probably in Venice. Photographs of it reached the British Museum in 1907, and some scholars think they inspired Pamela Colman Smith.
- Wikipedia contributors, Playing card (opens in a new tab), Mamluk origins, 1371
- Wikipedia, Tarot de Marseille (opens in a new tab), baton pips
- Global Spiritual Studies, Three of Staves (Visconti-Sforza) (opens in a new tab) Rights: Blog-style site; its own text hedges the description.
- Wikipedia contributors, Sola Busca tarot (opens in a new tab)
The Rider-Waite-Smith card
Pamela Colman Smith drew the Rider-Waite-Smith deck in 1909 for A. E. Waite; it was published by Rider in 1909-1910. Her Three of Wands is a scene: a robed man seen from behind stands on a height and looks out over the sea at ships, with three staves planted in the ground. This scene has no basis in the plain pip cards of the older Italian and Marseille decks.
The scene fixed the card’s modern image. T. S. Eliot’s 1922 poem The Waste Land names a “Man with Three Staves”, which the Wikipedia article on the card notes is tied to the Fisher King only quite arbitrarily by Eliot himself.
- Wikipedia contributors, Three of Wands (opens in a new tab)
- Global Spiritual Studies, Three of Staves (Visconti-Sforza) (opens in a new tab) Rights: Blog-style site; its own text hedges the description.
- Wikipedia contributors, Sola Busca tarot (opens in a new tab)
Waite’s description
A calm, stately personage, with his back turned, looking from a cliff’s edge at ships passing over the sea. Three staves are planted in the ground, and he leans slightly on one of them.
- Arthur Edward Waite, The Pictorial Key to the Tarot (opens in a new tab) (1910 (1911 edition)), Part III, section 2, Wands, Three Rights: Published 1910-1911; author died 1942.
Later meanings
Later occultists gave the suit and the card extra meanings that no 15th-century source has. Waite’s “established strength” is the same phrase. Wands are often linked to the fire signs Aries, Leo and Sagittarius, and Aleister Crowley’s Book of Thoth (1944) associates the suit with will and fire.
These are modern esoteric attributions, added centuries after the card first appeared, and they are not part of the Norse tradition. Tarot is Italian in origin and has no old connection to the runes.
- Wikipedia contributors, Suit of wands (opens in a new tab)
- Global Spiritual Studies, Three of Staves (Visconti-Sforza) (opens in a new tab), Book T Rights: Blog-style site; its own text hedges the description.
As read on this site
This is the meaning used for readings here. Using the tarot to divine is a modern practice, and the Norse figure shown for each card is this site’s own association; the tarot began as an Italian card game. A short history is on the Tarot page.
Upright
Keywords: early setback, first contact with difficulty, survivable cost, useful pain
First contact with a real difficulty draws blood, and that's expected, not a sign that everything is going wrong. Early wounds in any worthwhile undertaking are the cost of finding out what you're actually dealing with. They sting, and they're survivable, and the information they give you is worth more than the discomfort costs.
In general: An early difficulty is informative, not catastrophic. Use what it teaches rather than retreating from it.
In love: A first real disagreement or hurt in a new connection, painful but not disqualifying. How you both handle it matters more than that it happened.
In work: An early setback in a new venture that reveals something useful about what still needs strengthening.
Reversed
Keywords: reopened grievance, unresolved hurt, repetition of old pain, unhealed injury
Old wounds reopened rather than healed don't teach you anything new; they just hurt again, in the same place, for reasons that should have been resolved already. If a grievance keeps resurfacing in fresh arguments, the actual injury underneath it never got properly addressed. Treat the source, not just the latest flare-up.
In general: A pattern of pain keeps recurring because its actual source was never addressed. Treat the root, not the symptom.
In love: An old hurt being relitigated in a new disagreement. The current fight isn't really about the current thing.
In work: Past failures or grievances being brought up repeatedly rather than processed and set down.
Draw a card for a reading · How to read cards together · Reversed cards