5 of Swords
- Arcana Minor
- Suit Swords
- Figure on this site A war of words
In the earliest decks
The suit of swords comes from the Latin-suited playing cards of southern Europe, the family that also includes Italian and Spanish packs. The five of swords is a numbered card, and in the Italian-suited tradition numbered cards were not illustrated scenes. They were pips: a count of swords, sometimes with decoration.
In the Tarot de Marseille pattern, the sword pips are drawn as curved abstract lines that form a shape something like a mandorla. The odd-numbered cards, the five among them, add one fully drawn sword inside that design. The earliest surviving Marseille-pattern cards were made by Philippe Vachier in 1639, and other well-known makers include Jean Dodal in Lyon (about 1701 to 1715) and Nicolas Conver (about 1760). So the Marseille five of swords is a pattern of curves and one sword, with no figures and no story.
The exception among early decks is the Sola Busca, engraved in northern Italy around 1490 and painted by hand, probably in Venice around 1491. It is the earliest known tarot in which every suit card carries a picture, and it uses Arabic numerals on the pips. The artist is not known. Its suits are cups, coins, batons and swords.
- Wikipedia contributors, Suit of swords (opens in a new tab)
- Wikipedia, Tarot de Marseille (opens in a new tab), Pip cards; earliest decks
- Wikipedia contributors, Sola Busca tarot (opens in a new tab)
The Rider-Waite-Smith card
The familiar scene of the five of swords comes from the deck Pamela Colman Smith drew for A. E. Waite, published in 1909. A man stands in the foreground holding swords, two more lie on the ground, and two figures walk away under a stormy sky. Older Marseille-style cards showed only the sword pattern, so the figures and the setting are a new kind of picture for this card.
Smith may have had a model for the idea of illustrating every pip. Black-and-white photographs of all 78 Sola Busca cards were given to the British Museum in 1907, and Waite and Smith probably saw them there. Some scholars think she drew on that deck for the minor arcana, and examples usually named are the three of swords and the ten of wands.
- Wikipedia contributors, Sola Busca tarot (opens in a new tab), Pamela Colman Smith
- Wikipedia contributors, Five of Swords (opens in a new tab), Rider-Waite depiction
- Arthur Edward Waite, The Pictorial Key to the Tarot (opens in a new tab) (1910 (1911 edition)), Part III, Swords: Five Rights: Published 1910-1911; author died 1942.
Waite’s description
A disdainful man looks after two retreating and dejected figures. Their swords lie upon the ground. He carries two others on his left shoulder, and a third sword is in his right hand, point to earth. He is the master in possession of the field.
- Arthur Edward Waite, The Pictorial Key to the Tarot (opens in a new tab) (1910 (1911 edition)), Part III, section 2, The Lesser Arcana, Swords: Five (picture description only) Rights: Published 1910-1911; author died 1942.
Later meanings
The Golden Dawn, the British occult order active from the late 1880s, matched numbered cards to the planets, with the fives belonging to Mars, and it gave each of the 36 small cards a title. Later commentary names the five of swords there as the “Lord of Defeat”, tied to the first ten degrees of Aquarius and to Venus. These titles and attributions were added to tarot long after the cards were first made, and they belong to the occult tradition rather than to the early Italian decks.
- Wikipedia contributors, Minor Arcana (opens in a new tab), Golden Dawn planets
- T. Susan Chang, Reading the Decans: Winners and Losers (Aquarius I) (opens in a new tab) (2020)
As read on this site
This is the meaning used for readings here. Using the tarot to divine is a modern practice, and the Norse figure shown for each card is this site’s own association; the tarot began as an Italian card game. A short history is on the Tarot page.
Upright
Keywords: hollow victory, costly conflict, discord, winning at a loss
One figure walks off with all five swords while two others retreat empty-handed, and that's the actual image: a win that costs the winner something too, because everyone at the table loses a piece of the relationship to get there. This card names discord that isn't worth what it took, conflict with a hollow victory at the end of it. Winning this kind of fight is rarely the relief it was supposed to be.
In general: Something is being won here, but the victory is costing more than it's worth. Worth questioning whether this fight needed winning at all.
In love: An argument "won" in a way that leaves the relationship worse off regardless of who was technically right.
In work: A conflict resolved in your favor on paper, but at a cost to trust or goodwill that makes the win feel smaller than expected.
Reversed
Keywords: disengaging from conflict, refusing a hollow win, walking away, conflict without a winner
Walking away from the swords entirely, leaving them on the ground rather than collecting a win nobody actually wants, is sometimes the stronger move than picking up the spoils. This card, reversed, favors disengaging from a fight before it extracts its toll, recognizing that not every conflict needs a winner to be over.
In general: Stepping back from this fight costs less than winning it would. Leaving the swords on the ground is a legitimate choice.
In love: Choosing to step back from a conflict in the relationship rather than push it to a win, recognizing the win wouldn't be worth what it costs.
In work: Disengaging from a workplace conflict before it escalates into a victory nobody actually benefits from.
Draw a card for a reading · How to read cards together · Reversed cards