7 of Wands

  • Arcana Minor
  • Suit Wands
  • Figure on this site An ambush
Historical evidence

In the earliest decks

The suit now called Wands began as batons in the Italian, or Latin, card suits: coins, cups, swords and batons. These suits reached Europe in the 1370s from cards imported from Mamluk Egypt and Moorish Granada. In Italian decks the fourth suit looks like staves or batons, while Spanish and southern Italian versions look more like knobbly cudgels.

In the early Italian tarot decks the numbered cards were plain. One page on the Visconti-Sforza deck (about 1450, from the workshop of Bonifacio Bembo) describes its Seven of Staves as seven ceremonial staves among ornamental scrollwork, with no figure, no scene and no assigned meaning. Ideas such as defence or perseverance came much later. That page is a secondary source, so treat its detail as unconfirmed.

The Tarot de Marseille, whose earliest dated surviving cards come from Marseille in 1639, keeps the plain pips. Its batons are straight and cross to form a lattice in the higher numbers, with a single upright baton through the middle of the odd-numbered cards.

Historical evidence

The Rider-Waite-Smith card

The Rider-Waite-Smith deck was painted by Pamela Colman Smith to the instructions of A. E. Waite and first published in December 1909 by William Rider & Son of London. Earlier decks usually gave the numbered cards plain designs. Smith gave each pip card from two to ten a full scene, something last seen in the Sola Busca tarot, whose photographs she may have seen at the British Museum.

For the Seven of Wands she drew a lone figure on higher ground holding a staff against six staves raised from below. It is Smith’s composition, not a copy of the older cards.

Myth and literature · Quotation

Waite’s description

A young man on a craggy eminence brandishing a staff; six other staves are raised towards him from below.

Myth and literature · Context

Later meanings

Meanings for the numbered cards are later additions. Jean-Baptiste Alliette, called Etteilla, was the first to assign divinatory meanings to tarot cards, in a method of 1783 and a treatise of 1785. Court de Gébelin’s claim of 1781 that the tarot was Egyptian has no support from Egyptologists.

The Golden Dawn, founded in 1888, renamed the suits Wands and Pentacles and linked the cards from two to ten to astrological decans. The Seven of Wands came to be called the Lord of Valour in its Book T material (first published openly by Aleister Crowley in 1912), according to one secondary page. Waite’s own scene and text, quoted above, draw on this Golden Dawn tradition, which has no link to the cards of the 1400s.

Modern interpretation

As read on this site

This is the meaning used for readings here. Using the tarot to divine is a modern practice, and the Norse figure shown for each card is this site’s own association; the tarot began as an Italian card game. A short history is on the Tarot page.

Upright

Keywords: defending ground, conflict under pressure, holding a contested position, the cost of having something worth keeping

Holding the high ground means everyone below wants it, and defending a position worth having is exhausting precisely because it's worth having. This card isn't about clever maneuvering; it's about standing your ground while it's being contested, staff in hand, because retreating would cost more than the fight does. If something you value is under pressure right now, the answer isn't a clever angle. It's standing firm.

In general: Something you hold is being challenged, and defending it is the right response, even though defending takes more out of you than attacking would.

In love: Defending a boundary or commitment in the relationship that's being tested or pushed against, even when holding the line is tiring.

In work: Protecting a position, project, or territory at work that others are actively contesting. The defense is justified; staying in it is the work.

Reversed

Keywords: underestimated threat, lost ground, overconfidence, the cost of not taking it seriously

A position falls not because it couldn't have been held, but because the threat to it was dismissed as beneath notice until it wasn't anymore. This card, reversed, is the cost of underestimating a rival, a problem, or a pressure you didn't take seriously, and losing ground as a result that a more alert defense would have kept. The high ground is recoverable, but only once the threat is actually being respected.

In general: Something dismissed as unimportant has turned out to matter more than expected, and ground has been lost as a result. Reassess what actually deserves your guard.

In love: A dynamic or person you didn't take seriously enough turning out to have real, costly influence on the relationship.

In work: A competitor, risk, or pressure dismissed as minor proving more consequential than expected, costing you ground you didn't think was in danger.

Draw a card for a reading · How to read cards together · Reversed cards

Discovery trails that pass through here