Yggdrasil · The World Tree and Its Places
Mímameiðr
A tree named in Fjölsvinnsmál, which some scholars take to be Yggdrasill.
In Thorpe’s translation
20. Tell me, Fiolsvith! etc., what that tree is called that with its branches spreads itself over every land?
21. Mimameidir it is called; but few men know from what roots it springs: it by that will fall which fewest know. Nor fire nor iron will harm it.
- Benjamin Thorpe (translator), The Elder Eddas of Saemund Sigfusson (the Poetic Edda) (opens in a new tab) (19th c.; Norroena ed. 1906), Fjölsvinnsmál (The Lay of Fiolsvith), stanzas 20-21 (Thorpe’s numbering; other editions differ) Rights: Public domain. Nineteenth-century translation, in the public domain. Text as published online by Project Gutenberg (ebook #14726).
What the sources say
In Fjölsvinnsmál a visitor questions the guardian Fjölsviðr and asks the name of a tree whose branches spread over every land. The answer is Mímameiðr. Few know from what roots it springs, and it will fall by something few know. Neither fire nor iron harms it. Its fruit is laid on a fire for women in labour so that what should come out does, which the poem calls making it a creator of mankind.
A bird, Víðófnir, sits in its boughs. The poem does not say that the tree is Yggdrasill, and it does not mention Odin, the Norns or the well that other poems link with the world tree.
- r-fjolsvinnsmal, stanzas 20-25 (Thorpe’s numbering)
Names and background
The name is usually read as “Mímir’s tree” or “Mímir’s beam”, from the name Mímir and meiðr, a tree or pole. Some scholars suggest it is another name for Yggdrasill, since both are great trees that cover the world and Yggdrasill is linked elsewhere with Mímir’s well. Others hold that the poem describes a different tree, since it uses none of Yggdrasill’s usual names and gives its fruit a role in childbirth.
The question cannot be settled from the text alone.
- r-fjolsvinnsmal, stanzas 20-25 (Thorpe’s numbering)
Where the sources attest it
Mímameiðr is named in Fjölsvinnsmál, stanza 21 in Thorpe’s numbering. The poem is not in the Codex Regius and survives only in late paper manuscripts, which is one reason scholars handle it with care.
No other early text we checked uses the name, and there is no archaeological or pictorial evidence for it.
- r-fjolsvinnsmal, stanzas 20-25 (Thorpe’s numbering)